However, neither novel really makes a point of presenting realistic characters—or even particularly likeable ones.
He also dreams of the proles breaking free and overthrowing the Party, which they vastly outnumber. Winston Smith, the rebel ofis actually a member of the ruling elite, though in the lower echelon of it.
The proles are very much like those Gammas, Deltas and Epsilons, and are content with the easy comforts of life. When he begins to quote Cardinal Newman, or William James, we feel that there is more godliness in him than in John, whose Shakespearian quips are no match. These novels were not written as prophecies, but as warnings.
The Party does not bother to control them because, in fact, it is unnecessary to do so. Inpeople merely cease to exist. He presents the callous laughter of the audience as perfectly normal, and does not recognise his own lack of humanity either. Thus the family becomes one more means of surveillance, so that everyone is surrounded by people who cannot be trusted.
A new bitterness, and a new bewilderment, ran through all social life, and was reflected in all literature and art. He is logically correct in realising that they could do so, but at the same time it is clear that the proles are extremely unlikely to take such action.
Yet Winston does retain a normal human dread of actual death: In the tenth dictionary of Newspeak, we are told, certain words have been made obsolete—the opposite of what naturally happens to a language, for words become obsolete because they have ceased to be used, rather than because they have been erased.
Art and science has been banished because these are all marks of human passion and creativity, and therefore bear the seeds of instability: The real rebel is John the Savage, and he is a true outsider.
It made an excellent ending to the novel. John the savage found peace by hanging himself.
Ian Angus, Sonia Orwell. The rejection of history takes a more aggressive form inwhere it becomes impossible to understand the past, because the details of the past are constantly rewritten to conform with the requirements of the present.
Julia puts her finger on it, explaining to Winston that sex makes people happy and relaxed, while the Party prefers that their energies be channelled into other activities. The logical build-up to this, however, is not metaphysics, but rather politics.
The population is kept content with a rather meagre lot because of the constant war, which, as is explicitly stated in the Book, is a convenient means of maintaining the status quo, and the Party keeps a very close watch on those members of society who are deemed capable of disrupting it.
As a consequence Orwell is still concerned with politics, whereas Huxley shows a more developed stage in which politics have been overcome and technology has overtaken the whole process of dehumanizing humanity.
There are, interestingly, some moments of close correspondence between the books. Winston considers sex to be a political act, an expression of freedom. He is drawn to his lover Julia because she is corrupt and she enjoys sex, although she hides it by being a member of the "anti sex rally".
One day, Winston comes to work to find that all traces of an erstwhile colleague have been removed—Symes has ceased to exist. Naturally, this sort of behaviour is incomprehensible to The Savage, who has been brought up on the edges of a quite different society—and in a close relationship with his mother, to boot.Brave New World Imagine a world in which people are produced in factories, a world lost of all freedom and individuality, a world where people are exiled or “disappear” for breaking the mold.
Both by George Orwell and Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World are startling depictions of such a society. Compare and Contrast Brave New World Essay.
A. Pages:5 Words This is just a sample. To get a unique essay.
In comparison to Brave New World, the outsider and only man capable of making others realize the lie they lived in ended up killing himself. We will write a custom essay sample on Compare and Contrast Brave New.
In the books by George Orwell and Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, both authors depict a dystopian society with some disturbing similarities.
Orwell and Huxley each emphasize the use of power to control the masses. Comparing and Brave New World Essay - Comparing Orwell's and Huxley's Brave New World In Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four and Huxley’s Brave New World, the authoritative figures strive for freedom, peace, and stability for all, to develop a utopian society.
Brave New World is a dystopian novel, which extrapolated from the rise of technology, science, and totalitarianism in the s to imagine a future totalitarian state in which humanity had been robbed of all free choice and were forced into happiness through the manipulation of genetics and psychology.
Inthere is the leading lady Julia, and in Brave New World, there is Lenina Crowne. The main male character in is of course Winston Smith, and the leading man in Brave New World is a cross between Bernard Marx and John the so-called savage.4/4(1).Download